Caveats In Compounding
Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) is important to understand, but they don't tell the whole story. To get a better sense of the return stream, compare the CAGR to the total return for a period of time and then perform some basic sensitivity analysis.
“Compound interest is the eighth wonder of the world. He who understands it, earns it; he who doesn't, pays it.”
– Albert Einstein
“Compounding is the most powerful force in the universe”
– Albert Einstein
“My wealth has come from a combination of living in America, some lucky genes, and compound interest.”
– Warren Buffett
Compounding really is the 8th Wonder of the World. In a recent analysis, we were comparing the CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) of two portfolios and noticed two unique qualities of compounding that are important to remember when using CAGR:
1. Small differences in CAGR can compound to large differences over time
2. A 1% difference in two small CAGRs is not the same as a 1% difference in two large CAGRs
Small differences in CAGR can compound to large differences over time
Imagine you have two portfolios. One generating 8% per year and another 9%. The 1% difference seems trivial. Because of compounding, it is not.
The 10-year performance difference is a non-trivial 20.8%. This means that finding investments that may seem marginally different when compared at the small scale of a year, can have profound differences over time.
One interesting fact was that the total difference over ten years was 20.8%, which is not the same as the 1% difference compounded over 10 years, which is 10.5%. This leads to the second unique quality…
A 1% difference in two small CAGRs is not the same as a 1% difference in two large CAGRs
If we bump the performance slightly up but keep the difference 1%, the total difference grows from 20.8% to 22.6%.
That 1% difference gets to compound a bigger base and thus results in a larger total return difference. This is counterintuitive. An investor may be indifferent between a 23% and a 24% return while being sensitive to a 2% versus 3% return. The later seems much more meaningful because the relative difference is 50%.
In the graph below, the difference between a 2% and 3% return is $12.5M (12.5% on $100M fund) over 10 years. The difference between a 23% and 24% return is $62.1M! They are both 1% differences, but they are not created equal.
Compounding is amazing but can be amazingly difficult to conceptualize. As an investor, your job is to be a professional compounder. Keep your tools sharp by remembering that CAGRs don’t tell the whole story. To get a better sense of the return stream, compare the CAGR to the total return for a period of time and then perform some basic sensitivity analysis. This allows the compounding impact on returns to present itself in a way that is easier to put into perspective and help you make better decisions.